gmusic@nurturingnatures.co.uk

This blog is to critically introduce, and contextualise, new research findings from developmental research, neuroscience, attachment theory  and other areas of psychology that are topical or are likely to whet the appetite of  anyone interested. The aim is to discuss research which will feel relevant and which might even, if lucky, make a...

This blog is to critically introduce, and contextualise, new research findings from developmental research, neuroscience, attachment theory  and other areas of psychology that are topical or are likely to whet the appetite of  anyone interested. The aim is to discuss research which will feel relevant and which might even, if lucky, make a difference to how we approach our work or other areas of our lives.

More

Covid-19, Disproportionate BAME deaths, inequality and adverse childhood experience. A serious plague

 

As too often, the poorest and most discriminated against are suffering most, and bearing the brunt of an unequal neoliberal agenda.  This is a serious political issue, literally deadly serious

 

One of the extremely shocking features of the current epidemic is the disproportionate number of people from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Groups who have become ill and died. For example, many US cities report that 70% of the deaths have been from minority groups, even when these groups make up only 30% of the population. In the UK it looks like about 35%  are from non-white populations who in fact make up only 13% of the population, although, possibly as a cover-up, the government seems to not even be recording race and ethnicity formally.

There is a lot to unpick here, some speculative. The disproportionate illness levels are linked clearly to who is bearing the brunt on the front-line. Those designated as keyworkers, such as nurses, doctors, and equally those who work on public transport, in supermarkets, in refuse collection and many other ‘essential’ services, are at most risk of exposure to the virus. Many also have zero-hours contracts, work in poor conditions and are struggling to keep bread on the table and pay bills. A disproportionate number of people from BAME groups work in poorly paid insecure roles such as those above.  Similarly nursing in this country is shockingly under paid and a disproportionate proportion of nurses come from BAME backgrounds, and indeed vast numbers are imported from abroad due to worrying staff shortages.

Viral load, the sheer amount of exposure to the virus, is obviously an important causative factor, and explains some of the deaths of front-line health workers, but it is hard to square the pictures of the first 10 doctors who died in the UK all being from BAME groups. While some have hypothesised genetic predispositions, other research has talked about certain blood-types conferring resistance, and others talked of vitamin D deficiency, the jury is still out on these factors. Dietary factors linked to culture and social class/poverty might also be an issue (e.g. high fat, salty, sugary and especially processed foods). In addition, there likely is also unconscious racism, with certain groups possibly prodded to take on the riskier tasks, but we do not know for sure.

 However, what is incontrovertible is that a disproportionate number of people dying and having serious symptoms have what has euphemistically been called underlying health conditions. Those who seem particularly at risk are people who have well above average obesity levels, diabetes, heart and lung conditions and a range of metabolic syndrome disorders, as well as those who are immuno-suppressed. For the under 60’s for example, being obese seems to at least double the risk of hospital admission and indeed, mortality, and this has been seen in many countries, including the USA, UK and France.

This is by no means just bad luck and needs urgently to be linked to other findings out there about the effects of inequality, discrimination and particularly the long-term lifetime effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE’s). The data we have seen linking obesity and Covid-19 illness severity is crude, based primarily on Body Mass Index (BMI) measures, but we know that BMI is just one of many biomarkers linked with ACE’s .

What we know for certain is that, generally, more adverse life experiences, especially earlier on, are linked with worse health outcomes later, and to earlier death, and Covid-19 is not about to make an exception to this.

Multiple detailed studies show how, using basic measures of ACE’s, the more ACE’s someone has experienced, the worse the physical as well as mental health outcomes. While obesity is one marker, we see the same link and trajectory with, for example,  hypertension, heart disease, strokes, cancer, diabetes, arthritis,  lung disease, insulin resistance, inflammatory disorders, to name a few, and that is without mentioning the host of psychological effects, from depression,  anxiety disorders, eating disorders, a list too long to write. Typical, and hugely relevant for Covid-19,  is the clear link between ACE’s and COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, a huge cause of death anyway in the western world, and about 2.6% higher in those with 5 or more ACE’s.

It is important to note a few things here. While adverse experiences might increase the likelihood of behaviours which are risky, including smoking, poor diet, addictive behaviours, still, the pathways to such ill-health and the links between psychological and physiological states are multi-layered and overdetermined. Yet, seems clear that important genetic pathways are turned on or off by adverse experiences, one example being the glucocorticoid receptor, very linked to many serious psychiatric disorders. Being under stress and thereat lowers our immune responses, and anyone’s immediate survival needs in the face of danger will trump the body’s desire to look after long-term immunity. Indeed cortisol, often seen as the ‘stress hormone’, is a steroid with immune dampening effects.

Similarly, more Adverse Childhood Experiences equates with a range of effects on the nervous system, and the brain (eg on the hippocampus, amygdala, PFC and so much more). Constantly being on ‘red-alert’ for danger or stress has powerful effects on immune functioning and the ability of the body to relax and recover, the healthy parasympathetic ‘rest-and-digest system barely getting a look-in while we are under threat.

How does this link to BAME morbidity and risk in the current crisis? People from minority ethnic groups are grossly over-represented in the population struggling with poverty, economic stressors, scary neighbourhoods, psychiatric problems and so much more.  We are seeing the effects of structural inequality at a society-wide level. Of course, as scholars such as Wilkinson and Marmot have shown unequivocally, inequality itself in a society has profound health effects. The more unequal societies have much worse health outcomes than more egalitarian ones.,

This is without taking account of the effects of, for example racism. Racial discrimination alone has an effect at a biological and cellular level. Those from minority groups in areas of the US with more discrimination have been found  to have higher levels of the stress hormone, cortisol, and also show faster biological ageing, as measured by telomere length. This is mediated by oxidative stress and is linked, for example with type-2 diabetes and obesity.  The over-determining factors pile up. More stress increases the propensity for addictive behaviours, for having raised blood sugars (needed in fight/flight responses), for eating the /sugar/salt infused food peddled by fast food companies, to conserve fat more, to affect sleep, needed for immune responses, and so it goes, on and on and on. This is the tip of the iceberg.

We might add to this the effects of lockdown. While the privileged, like myself, can manage to pay bills and buy food and have a home with internal and external space, many families lack this pressure valve, and were already experiencing huge emotional challenges pre-Covid. As children’s charities are warning, such serious chronic stressors are being exacerbated in the current crisis. We have seen an increase in domestic violence reported and we might surmise that there is also likely to be an increase in child maltreatment.  People in such families are already suffering, especially the children perhaps, but the chickens will certainly come home to roost in terms of poor health outcomes later in life, and indeed intergenerationally.

We need to begin to take this research very seriously. As Marmot’s recent report showed, health inequalities, even pre-covid, had worsened in the last decade, Life expectancy has stalled in the UK, inequality has widened, and more people are predicted to be in worse health as they get older.  Perhaps most worrying of all, wealth inequalities have grown hugely, and of course on average those from BAME groups tend to suffer the worst effects of this.

Thus while it is true that there are links, for example, between obesity and COVID morbidity, the obesity factor is just one piece of the puzzle. Without doubt, racism and discrimination needs to be taken very seriously, and fought against, but it also needs to be linked to structural inequalities. Obesity is just one of multiple biomarkers that we might use and there is host of other measurable markers one could point to.

This is a serious political issue, literally deadly serious, and as often the poorest and most discriminated against are suffering most and bearing the brunt of an unequal neoliberal agenda. This is not just about the level of NHS resources, and who has access to them, although it is as well. This issue of who is ill and dying and why, goes to the root of how we have organised society, and the effects of this are showing up at a biological and cellular level as well as psychologically. While we all applaud the amazing courage and generosity of our NHS frontline workers, this might also be a moment to stand up and be heard campaigning about racial and other inequalities.

 

  1281 Hits
  4 Comments
Recent Comments
Guest — Melinda Elson
Thank you for this Graham, a very important piece. Perhaps you can get this into one of the national papers? It needs to be read, ... Read More
Monday, 20 April 2020 19:13
Guest — Emily
I agree, I’d like to see this information being distributed more widely as the ramifications of this crisis are going to be far re... Read More
Tuesday, 21 April 2020 20:19
Guest — Deirdre Fay
This is an important link you're making, Graham. As you say, "literally deadly serious" ...."goes to the root of how we have org... Read More
Saturday, 25 April 2020 15:08
1281 Hits
4 Comments

Brief briefings from isolation. Zooming in or zoomed out? Tech use and small silver linings

We are all experiencing different forms of discombobulation in the current crisis and finding our own ways to manage our situations.  This is not a life or death matter, but I have been thinking about our use of technology and web-based interactions in the crisis and lockdown.  I, like many, have made friends with technology in a surprising way and have been developing a newfound gratitude for it!

Pre-covid many of us felt like slaves to our devices, being addicted, despite ourselves, to a range of media, twitter, Instagram, emails, Whatsapp and flicking through news. For others it was gaming, shopping, gambling and for many it was more worrying media such as pornography. What we had been learning from research on the brain was that high use of such media was correlated with higher activity in brain areas also involved in addiction and the dopaminergic system, such as the nucleus accumbens and ventral striatum.

This was no coincidence. The most senior executives of tech companies have admitted how they aim to keep us online by stimulating little dopamine surges, and of course the more they keep us online, the more advertising they can sell. Many such senior executives, such as Tim Cook of Apple, have been quoted as saying that they do not let children in their lives use social media or smartphones. Interestingly Mark Zuckenberg does not use facebook, and the same is true of executives at twitter and other  Big Tech  companies who are fully aware of the addictive patterns  tech use creates. They seem to be guided by the old dealer’s mantra ‘never get high on your own supply’.

For many the effect of high levels of screen-time has been a buzzy mindset, our minds jumping around even more, less capacity to be still and concentrate, less activity in parts of the brain central to executive functioning as well as empathy and emotional regulation, and what some have called ‘hypo-frontality’, the downegulation of the prefrontal cortex. Seemingly concentration spans had been diminishing in most western countries, some have suggested we are at risk of falling behind goldfish in our capacity to attend! This is alongside falls in empathy, and presumably compassion.

So what now, in the midst of this crisis? This is purely personal and anecdotal, but I have found that, whilst I still spend too long fiddling on my phone and flicking around for news, such as for death rates or politicians’ announcements or yet another daft meme, I have noticed something new.

I can now have longer conversations on a screen without jumping around between websites and computer windows, probably to the chagrin of google and others who depend on our jumpy attention to sell advertising . Most days I will have long chats, with friends, or family, over video, where we can concentrate on each other and give each other time. Like many I have had several dinner dates, bookclubs and other  fulfilling interactions. I am seeing patients over similar media, and often the work is deep, people feeling reached, heard, empathised with; surprisingly genuine compassion seems possible via screens.  Similarly I have been doing some teaching, as well as giving and receiving meditation spaces, and partaking in yoga and pilates classes and personal fitness training sessions.

Whether or not these activities are as fulfilling as doing them ‘in the flesh’ is a moot point, and for me I don’t feel they are, some feeling more satisfactory than others. I particularly miss whole body awareness, the cues from body language that are harder to get, the clues from other senses such as smell. Nonetheless these new forms of interaction are changing how  we might experience the computer screen. Some of this is pure Pavlovian behaviorial association. For example, while I have worried about seeing patients online who use the very same screen to meet with me and to view worrying images, a shift seems already to be occurring. Research by people like Valerie Voon had found that for a porn ‘addict’ just seeing a computer screen could give rise to activation in brain areas central to the dopaminergic system, such as the ventral striatum, the exact same areas that we see light up when an alcoholic, for example, walks past a bottle of their tipple of choice. My hope is that this association will change for  tech addicts such as our porn user patients, as they increasingly use screens to communicate in more meaningful ways. Again, only anecdotally, I am noticing my body being in a less buzzy state as I sit by my screen in anticipation of a 50 minute session or family chat. Earlier research showed that waiting for our email inbox to open gave rise to spikes of stress-induced sympathetic nervous system activity, but I don’t notice that when I am about to have a therapy session or meet an old friend online, even if it is not really the same.

Of course it is not the technology that has ever been the problem but rather, how it is manipulated by the companies that harvest data and make unthinkable sums of money via advertising and the like. There always have been countervailing forces thankfully, even before new tech experiences arising from lockdown. For example,  I have become increasingly interested in uses of tech such as in neurofeedback, which can support the development of a range of skills such as concentration, mindfulness, executive-functioning and many other hopeful developments, including ameliorating symptoms such as ADHD, depression, trauma-symptomatology and much more.

Like so much in these dark times,  we must face the awful reality of what so many are experiencing, but there might also be some silver linings, whether working less, being less frantic, being less materialistic, less polluted, and possibly we might add a new way of being with and harnessing tech, taming it so it does what we want it for, for us to feel more human, to make it helpful for us,  a resource we can use for the good,  rather than our too common knee-jerk reactivity to Big-Tech puppet masters pull their powerfully addictive  strings.

 

  645 Hits
  0 Comments
645 Hits
0 Comments

Coronavirus, moral panic, psychic and physical threat, danger and social immunity

 

We are in the grip of huge physical and psychological threat from the coronavirus. Like all species, humans have clearly evolved mechanisms for both responding to, and avoiding, pathogens. There are similarities between the fear response, as seen for example when there is danger of being confronted by an aggressor or predator, and the fear of pathogens. Both give rise to distrust, anxiety, fear of the ‘other’, ‘disgust’, and autoimmune inflammatory reactions.

I have been watching my own and others’ reactions on the streets. Fear, anxiety and distrust are powerfully present. It feels strange to shirk proximity, move away from strangers and avoid close contact. I particularly feel for children now, as they, as potential ‘spreaders’, are eliciting fear and disgust reactions in many which could have a psychic effect. The brain circuits involved in physical pain are equally active in social ostracism, and children particularly tend to interpret the world through adult eyes, and as Winnicott said, gain their sense of self that way. Who wants to be viewed as a social leper, a dangerous potential pathogen inducer to be avoided?

Avoiding danger is of course is what most species do,  moving away from pathogens, whether avoiding infected foods, forming colonies near plants that pathogens don’t like, or developing internal group hygiene, such as bees clearing out worrying larvae and ants at times doing the equivalent of ‘deep-cleaning’.  Many species do what we are doing now, and actively become more isolated.

When we smell something putrid or ‘off’ we tend to feel, and indeed signal, disgust, and whole areas of the brain, particularly the insula, are activated. Smell is possibly the most powerful sense-organ, but sight (eg awareness of other’s worrying bodily  such as boils or pox) and touch also are used to detect threat. Indeed, trauma victims so often seem to have highly developed sense of smell, especially when the abuse happens at a very young age. Decisions such as what to eat, who to mate with, are influenced by such subtle non-conscious factors.

What we know is that when in a state of stress or when sensing danger, we all tend to be more suspicious and less welcoming of others generally, in psychoanalytic language we have heightened paranoid-schizoid responses. Humans anyway have an innately constituted fear of  those we see as ‘other’. Even babies prefer others who look like them, talk like them, and act like the trusted adults in their circles, but that exacerbates in times of fear and danger, when borders are all but closed.

Social safeness and safeness from pathogens are linked. A classic example is grooming within groups of conspecifics, like primates., Those who are groomed and groom have been shown to harbour less infection-inducing tics and parasites. The additional benefit is feeling good. Higher status chimps get groomed more, especially by low status ones, for example, and grooming fosters a sense of social harmony in which neurochemicals such as oxytocin are released. In humans we have other mechanisms which foster the same things. Singing, dancing, social and family gatherings, which all heighten oxytocin and immune responses, lower inflammatory ones, and are linked with feeling good. Social outcasts, whether primates or humans, tend to have lower serotonin, for example, and higher cortisol. This is a  real danger at the moment when isolation and lack of community is a threat to mental health and especially the psychologically vulnerable..

I had always assumed that in-group loyalty and out-group suspicion, even in babies,  had a good evolutionary rationale as a main predator of infants and children was often males from another social group who might, for example, kill offspring spawned by other men and indeed, kill those other men too. What I had not sufficiently considered is the powerful fear of the ‘other’ carrying genuinely dangerous pathogens. We know this all too well from the accounts of the genocide of indigenous populations in Australia and the Americas, decimated by viruses carried by Europeans.

Fascinatingly of course oxytocin fosters not only in-group trust and cohesion but also distrust of those in out-groups. I again had always assumed this also to be linked to the dangers of attacks from rival groups, but it makes sense that fear of viruses and pathogens is central here too.

It is no coincidence that Trump, in characteristic xenophobic fashion, attacks a ‘foreign’ virus. Pathogens of course are always ‘foreign’ but this conflation of fear of a pathogen and fear of the other is worryingly common. Certainly, anecdotally it is my non-white clients, particularly Asian ones, who have felt most shunned in the last few weeks. We know from social neuroscience that we can non-consciously demonise certain others, such as the homeless and drug-addicts,  and despite what we consciously avow, often our brains, when looking at drug--addicts, or even those of other ethnicities, show less activity in networks involved in empathy and recognising the other as human, such as areas in the medial prefrontal cortex. Instead we often see increase activity in areas of the insula which are linked with disgust signals as well as in amygdala-linked fear and aggressive reactions. Both also are often activated with a threat of pathogens. The worry is that dehumanisation can kick in, the other (e.g the infected, but also the rival shopper) becoming ‘subhuman’. Similar brain mechanisms are thus involved in both Trump-like xenophobia, and in fear of pathogens.

A major health concern is the rise in inflammatory conditions. Inflammation of course is an appropriate response to heal an injury, wound or danger. We need inflammation when we have an injury or when eating toxic food. Our immune antibody army then generally does a great job sending inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, TNF-alpha, CRP, and multiple macrophages etc  in to fight dangerous intruders. However, such immune responses go into overdrive in disorders such as lupus, fibromyalgia and so much more, and cannot tell the difference between the benign and the dangerous. The same happens with trauma, high levels of stress and competition threats, including this virus. It is no coincidence that stress, trauma in childhood is linked to higher levels of most pro-inflammatory cytokines in adulthood. 

High inflammation is also central in depression, and inflammation might have had a specific evolutionarily important role in managing pathogens and disease, fevers and hot temperatures often vital for dealing with viruses and other diseases. High inflammation is also linked to social aversion as well as stress, depressive symptomatology, anhedonia, lethargy, possibly because social isolation decreases infection risk. High cytokine activity comes with threat responses, hypervigilance and much else seen in stress, anxiety and psychological trauma. The same genes are involved in both depression and defence against pathogens, genes that are less present in societies where there is less risk of physical infection, and where there is also less depression.

What we seem to be uncovering is an extraordinary synergy between fear of the other, fear of pathogens, expectation of danger or threat and links with the rise of xenophobia, racism and ‘othering’, and links also between these and depressive and other metal health symptomatology.

Anyway of course, in danger and major stress brain circuits involved in empathy and rational thought go into abeyance as survival-based responses kick in, including panic and aversion, and that is in large part what we are seeing in the panic-buying and hoarding. It is interesting that in more socialised  European countries, those less in the grip of neoliberal competitive ideologies,  there is plentiful food on shelves, unlike in our increasingly competitive one with decimated services, massively cut hospital beds and our main drivers increasingly being individualism, profit and greed.

Assuming that lock-down, isolation and banning foreigners is the right approach for covid-19 ,  we still need to recognise that this comes with dangers to us as a society, such as discrimination, vigilant distrust, depression and much more. There are also real risks in social isolation, and taking away the main sources of emotional wellbeing, which are community and cherished others. In response we need to keep alive influences that combat this, whether friendships, family, forms of self-care. I have noticed myself giving really nice looking people a wide birth, and but if I catch myself I can take a deep breath,  thank them for moving away from me rather than feeling threatened, and while keeping a distance, make sure I have a slightly more open face, smile (heart) as I walk through the places I can still walk.

We can and should, for our own and others’ good, keep alive our capacity to reach out compassionately and kindly to others at a time when such pathways are endangered by heightened threat, fear and disgust reactions, alongside social withdrawal. So, if we need to self-isolate to protect self or others, or if we have to work on the front-line, at the risk of being Polyanna-ish, let’s try to keep hold of compassion, for ourselves and others.

 

 

 

  2798 Hits
  4 Comments
Recent Comments
Guest — Sarah Hartley
Thank you for this Graham!
Saturday, 14 March 2020 13:31
Guest — Gabriela
Thank you graham! So well spoken! Kindly Gabriela Jones
Sunday, 15 March 2020 08:55
Guest — KeiraLianne
Very interesting- thank you for sharing!
Monday, 16 March 2020 23:04
2798 Hits
4 Comments

Neglecting Neglect: Why Therapists Do It & How We Can Break the Cycle 

A version of this blog recently appeared on the Psychotherapy Execellence Website  here  

 

Why Neglect?

In Nurturing Children I use clinical stories to illustrate essential elements of good therapeutic work. Ultimately therapeutic success depends on a good alliance, empathy, compassion and mutual resonance, alongside carefully gleaned skills and understanding. Yet some patients leave us feeling de-skilled, hopeless, even dreading sessions. I find this especially when working with people with histories of neglect, who have experienced insufficient growth-inducing experiences. This is different to those who are victims of, for example overt abuse or violence, who tend to be more reactive and challenging,

 

The feelings stirred up in us can be hard to own up to if our personal narratives include being ‘caring’, ’interested’ and ‘empathic’.

  • With such clients we often feel flat, bored and dulled-down.
  • They appear 'empty', inhibited, passive, self-contained, with minimal capacity for mentalizing.
  • They show little pleasure, rarely inspiring hope, affection or passion.
  • They can be thought of as 'under-looked' or 'unenjoyed', or after Alvarez, ‘undrawn’ rather than ‘withdrawn’.
  • They slip out of minds, stirring up little interest or worry.

 

Spectrum of neglect

  • from extremely deprived orphans to milder forms,
  • such as those with very emotionally avoidant, or depressed parents.

True I risk conflating symptoms and causes, as similar histories do not necessarily lead to the same symptoms, but there are sufficient commonalities to describe a common clinical experience.

 

Double deprivation

Neglected children initially receive scant attention, and later further deprive themselves by barely recognising life-enhancing relationship opportunities. While born with the same preconceptions of lively interpersonal exchanges as anyone, the lack of good experiences leads to lifeless internal objects, with little hope of introjecting anything good. They seem to project little too, having surprisingly little effect on others.

 

Nervous systems and brains

Inadequate early experience leads to ‘dampened down' nervous systems, the opposite of hyperactive aroused people. Emotional deprivation profoundly affects brain architecture, and programs our neurochemical system. (eg releasing less oxytocin).  Many develop autistic-like symptoms, lacking empathy and avoiding intimacy. We see deficits in right orbitalfrontal region, central to attachment patterns and emotional regulation, and less prefrontal left brain activation, central to agency and pleasure.

 

Countertransference

Such people evoke less interest than those with better developed autobiographical and emotional capacities. Our words and gestures, given with meaning, can feel denuded of life. It is in one’s countertransference that one really learns about these clients, and what it is like to be them, but our attuned resonance can lead us to feel as dead as them. We can say things in therapy just to escape their lifeless worlds.

 

Clinical technique

We must sustain an empathic stance without being drawn too far into such lifelessness, to stay psychologically animated enough to breathe life back into their psyches, while avoiding the trap of a 'going-through-the-motions'  faux  psychotherapy. Research even shows that anyone interacting with avoidant people becomes less interested in people generally!

 

With such patients we need a more ‘active’ technique. They often know little about positive emotional experiences such as enjoyment, excitement, attunement, playfulness or joy. To develop an interest in oneself and others, someone must have been interested in us. In therapy we tend to work a lot with clients’ defensive and fear systems, helping to manage difficult feelings. However, with these patients we also need to build their ‘appetitive’ seeking systems, via mutually enjoyable interactions, allowing aliveness to flourish.

 

Summary

Humans are born ‘experience expectant’, primed for interpersonal interaction, but emotional development is stymied without growth-inducing relationships. In therapy we need to find a way to encourage agency and positive affect, and the paradoxically, step back from lifeless encounters to empathically be in touch with such lifelessness. With them we walk a delicate tightrope between amplifying aliveness, agency and enjoyment while not being too intrusive, manic or seductive.

 

This blog describes children and adults I feel particularly worried about, who rarely inspire passion and therapeutic zeal, who have been neglected emotionally in their early lives, and often then evoke further neglect. The long-term sequelae of such neglect can be 'deadly' serious, probably more harmful, yet less noticed, than more visible trauma. Neglected children and adults I have worked with often ‘warm up’, get livelier and more real, given sufficient adaptation to our practice, and the courage of emotional honesty.

 

Continue reading
  928 Hits
  0 Comments
928 Hits
0 Comments

Joining forces; Telomeres, social, psychological and political challenges

 

In the last few days I came across yet another interesting article [1] showing that prenatal stress is linked with  shorter telomeres. Telomeres are those caps on the end of chromosomes that can fray and shorten with stress and age [3], are a classic biomarker for health. Shorter telomeres are bad news, heralding ill health, and indeed, early death, or in other words early stress might program the body to develop a faster metabolism, which also leads to faster ageing and more physical and mental illness. One recent meta-analysis looking at over 40 papers corroborated how early adversity, such as abuse or neglect, links with shorter telomere length [2].

Continue reading
  2090 Hits
  0 Comments
2090 Hits
0 Comments

Death penalty for being abused? The price is too high for society and disadvantaged young people

 

Young people who had been in the care system are far more likely to die in early adulthood than their peers, a report showed last week; indeed they are at least 7 times more likely to die prematurely, before the age of 21. The BBC story about this highlighted poor access to mental health services, the lack of general support available, and the consequent over-use of drugs, alcohol and other forms of unhealthy self-medication and attempts to manage stressors.

I have worked with children in the care system for over 30 years and at least the research is showing what we have always known clinically. Bad early experiences lead young people to use drugs, alcohol, take risks in sexual and other behaviours, but also to struggle academically, socially and in their emotional wellbeing generally. Most of my most worrying cases in the NHS have been in the care system, and major crises often occur at the age when they are supposed to become ‘independent’ at the age when most well-adjusted children from loving families in fact rely on their families more than ever.

 

Continue reading
  1812 Hits
  1 Comment
Recent comment in this post
Guest — Michael J Reiss
Very convincing.
Tuesday, 28 February 2017 14:52
1812 Hits
1 Comment